Discussion about Scientific Writing and the Review Process led by Shanna and Nhi!
- Sternberg, R.J. (1997). “Eight common misconceptions about psychology papers” in The Psychologist’s Companion: A Guide to Scientific Writing for Students and Researchers, 3rd Ed., 6-19. Cambridge University Press.
- Wicker, A. W. (1985). Getting out of our conceptual ruts: Strategies for expanding conceptual frameworks. American Psychologist, 40(10), 1094-1103.
- McGuire, W.J. (1997). Creative hypothesis generating in psychology: Some useful heuristics. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 1–30.
- Abelson, R.O. (1995). “Articulation of results: Ticks and buts”. In Statistics as Principled Argument, 1st Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 104-131.
- Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178–182.
Supplemental: Meta-Analysis and Viz!
Cribbie-Meta_Analysis.pdfandEx-MetaAnalysis.Rmd